Given the volume and seriousness of the allegations against the Cleveland Browns quarterback, our columnist wonders if an N.F.L. suspension is enough of a punishment.
Twenty-two accusers. No, this just in, make that 23. Wait, now it’s 24.
Should the N.F.L. suspend Deshaun Watson, the quarterback who got a $230 million deal from the Cleveland Browns even though he has been accused of harassment and assault by a steadily growing list of female massage therapists?
Sure, the league could do that, and given the slop bucket of allegations, it wouldn’t be surprising if it did. But should it?
If you go on Browns message boards, scroll through Twitter or just talk to some women, a lot of people are making the case that Watson, the former Houston Texans quarterback, should never throw an N.F.L. pass again.
A suspension for a set number of games this coming season, their thinking goes, is not enough. Nor is a season, or even two, off. If America’s most popular sports league is to honor its pledge to stand behind women and victims of abuse, Watson needs to be barred.
Watson “should not be playing in the league at all,” says Brenda Tracy, a prominent victims’ rights advocate who travels the country counseling college and professional athletes to stand against harassment and abuse. “It’s ridiculous. I don’t understand the lengths these leagues will go to protect these men. He needs to go.”
Sure, such a move would be unprecedented. Watson vigorously proclaims his innocence, particularly now that two Texas grand juries have decided against proceeding with criminal charges — though that’s not rare in cases where women make sexual harassment claims.
If barred, he would surely press the league for reinstatement. Maybe even sue. Let him try.
A signal would have been sent: The N.F.L. is no longer willing to put the games and the myth and the money ahead of absolutely everything.
I write this with a queasy stomach. I’m still digesting the latest revelations about Watson unearthed by The New York Times’s Jenny Vrentas, whose reporting this week showed that the 26-year-old quarterback engaged in more questionable behavior than anybody realized.
Watson, we now know, hired at least 66 female massage therapists over 17 months, from the fall of 2019 to the spring of 2021. Among them were strangers he tracked down on Instagram and women who worked at a spa on the side of a highway.
Keenly aware that their bodies are their lifeblood, top N.F.L. players typically find no more than a few experts to give limb-loosening massages.
Having 66 massage therapists is no crime, but it is, in fact, a galaxy away from the norm.
Of the 66, some stood up for Watson, saying publicly that he did nothing wrong. But last week, two more women pressed claims in civil court, bringing the count of current accusers to 24. Some women who massaged Watson did not call a lawyer or the police after, but even they told The Times that Watson seemed to be looking for more than a relief from soreness. The sheer numbers are head-spinning, and the portrayals of Watson’s aggression and entitlement are chilling.
The woman who filed the most recent suit claimed that Watson masturbated during a massage, ending in a way that satisfied him and demeaned her.
A woman who decided not to sue or complain to the police told Vrentas that Watson made repeated requests for sex acts during the massage, including “begging” her to put her mouth on his penis.
“I specifically had to say, ‘No, I can’t do that,’” the woman said.
Watson and his well-connected legal team have continually denied any wrongdoing. They admit sex occurred on three occasions, but only after the massages, and always at the women’s instigation. “I understand the seriousness of the allegations,” Watson said at a news conference in March. “I’ve never assaulted a single woman. I’ve never disrespected any woman.”
His claims of innocence got a boost when the Browns, a once-proud team now so desperate for a championship that it has lost any dignity, gave him a better deal than those of Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers and Russell Wilson: $230 million, every penny reportedly guaranteed.
Meantime, N.F.L. investigators are looking into the allegations and Commissioner Roger Goodell is expected to decide soon on Watson’s possible punishment. The history is not encouraging.
In 2014, Goodell, under pressure after video evidence was published, admitted mishandling the Ray Rice domestic abuse case and vowed to do better. But what has changed other than empty promises and marketing campaigns aimed at wooing female fans?
In 2018, Kansas City’s Kareem Hunt, then one of the most promising running backs in football, was videotaped shoving a woman to the ground and kicking her. The N.F.L. suspended Hunt for eight games even though the woman did not press charges. Guess who signed Hunt next after Kansas City sent him packing.
The Cleveland Browns did. Clearly, half-season suspensions send no real message.
It is hard to see how anyone can take the N.F.L. seriously when it says it cares about women and the behavior of everyone associated with the league. Not after its meek responses to Rice and Hunt. Not after it let Antonio Brown play for Tampa Bay and star in the 2021 Super Bowl as he faced accusations of sexual harassment and a lawsuit accusing him of rape. Not when the league fails to appropriately punish the Washington Commanders, a team riddled with harassment complaints that have even ensnared the team owner, Daniel Snyder.
The league needs to send the most potent message it can that sexual misconduct won’t be tolerated.
I know banishment might sound to some like a radical, overly harsh punishment. A significant portion of the N.F.L. fan base says Watson shouldn’t be punished at all. Innocent until proven guilty, say these apologists, part of the club who care more about bread-and-circus entertainment than doing the right thing.
But the N.F.L. can do as it pleases.
Imagine that Watson managed a car dealership. Imagine his bosses found out he faced 24 civil suits alleging sexual misconduct. How long would he have a job?
Imagine Watson were a journeyman N.F.L. practice player whom few had ever heard of. Would he be getting second chances from teams and the league? No. Journeymen do not get second chances. It’s different for stars (unless you’re a star who kneels during the national anthem and leads the protest against police abuse of Black people).
If you really want to imagine something, imagine you’re a massage therapist who trusted a wealthy, famous client you’d never met, and ended up so hurt and humiliated that you quit the work forever, as one of Watson’s accusers did. Maybe that’s all the imagining you need to do.
Bagikan Berita Ini
0 Response to "Deshaun Watson’s Case is a Test of What the NFL Stands For - The New York Times"
Post a Comment